DSRPTV BE — DSRPTV Talk to an operator
00 / Proof

The work. Measured in cars sold, not platform claims.

Two case studies. Real dealers. The before, the after, and the strategy in between.

CASE STUDY · OUTCOME PARTNER · Q4
30:1

Return on attributed spend

Cars / mo 47 → 89
Cost / sale $405 → $262
01 / Case study · HRIZN

Content at scale.

HRIZN is DSRPTV's content engine. Months of publishing across a partner cohort, one shared system for putting research-grade automotive content on the open web.

The headline outcomes below are the trailing four-month read across that partner cohort — not a single dealer, not a peak month, the average of what the engine is currently producing.

HRIZN · TRAILING 4MO PARTNER COHORT
42,719

Organic sessions / month, from HRIZN content

Impressions 3.1M
Share of organic 65%
External Read the full case study on hrizn.io →

Want this for your store?

Request a market scan →
02 / Case study · Partner

From 47 to 89.

DSRPTV's lead operator and Mickey were on a weekly phone call for roughly a year before any contract existed. No pitch, no agenda — two automotive operators talking shop. Inventory, market trends, what was working, what wasn't.

In 2024 the partner averaged 47 cars a month. By early 2025 they'd pushed to 55, but the agency handling their marketing couldn't keep up — spend more on ads, move the money to another channel, "we can do it better." A management fee layered on top of vendor ad spend, no stocking analysis, no targeting intelligence, no understanding of who the partner was spending to reach.

Second half of 2025, Mickey moved the partner to DSRPTV. Stocking strategy, performance KPIs, structured analysis, custom internal software for lot organization and deal tracking, and identity resolution layered into marketing so spend targeted verified buyers, not zip codes.

PARTNER · Q3 → Q4 VERIFIED
47 → 89

Cars sold per month

Cost / sale $405 → $262
Return 30:1
Feb 2026 · deep read Most efficient month on record
Close rate
13.96%

Leads to sales

Inventory turn
50%

Of the lot, in the month

Leads / sale
7.16

Down from 11+ pre-DISC

On current rhythm the partner is pacing to $3.5M+ in attributed gross for 2026 — a track that wasn't on the table before the DISC filter and the operator cadence landed.

None of this happened because we ran better ads. The cost per lead barely moved. What moved was conversion — because the targeting was real, the inventory matched the demand, and the processes on the ground supported the growth.

That's the difference between a vendor and a partner. You don't always need more money, new vendors, or more leads. Sometimes all you need is a partner.

03 / Contact

What's it going to be?